Throughout the course of my trip to Japan, I have been fortunate to have visited some of the most historically important and cherished sites of the nation. Each locale expressed a different facet of Japanese culture and life, while simultaneously letting our group step through different chapters of history. As with any culture, Japanese society is incredibly complex and multifaceted. The different experiences at these places helped to illustrate just a few of the many pieces that compose what it means to be Japanese, while also helping to illustrate what makes us Americans. The lasting impact of these episodes has helped to coalesce in my mind the understanding that Hiroshima’s memory of August 6, 1945, is not something easily sorted and compartmentalized, but rather a collection of experiences that are interconnected in ways that both argue for private remembrance and public remonstrance for the events that occurred on that fateful day.
Before one can understand and interpret the impact of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, it is necessary to first comprehend what it is exactly that is important to Japanese society and why nuclear weapons are so uniquely capable of threatening those same values. American history is only a small speck in time when considering Japan’s past. Because the overturning of British rule happened only a historically short time ago, American culture is still very much about independence in thought, action, and lifestyle. This extends to family units, which exist in isolation, a point that is exacerbated by the fact that many American citizens are composed of those that were willing to break ties with their home country to move and start a new life. Japan, by contrast, was built with an ear towards Confucian ideals and Shinto rice farming culture, which push for unity, social harmony, hierarchy, and especially the belief in continuing the unbroken chain of life with the extension of familial generations both forward and backwards in time. With the addition of Buddhism and the complicated Japanese system of handling the dying and the dead, the point is reinforced that in Japan the actions of the living have a direct impact on the deceased.
To continue the metaphor, if Japanese life is viewed as a chain leading into the infinite past and infinite future, then the atomic bomb is the industrial cutting wheel aimed at the weakest link. Nuclear weapons do not kill a soldier on the field and leave the family to grieve at home. While a rifle round will terminate its flight in a backstop, the effects of nuclear fallout and radiation sickness continue to smash links in the chain moving forward in time. Although Miyajima indeed “echoes the impermanence of all things,” the truth is that the Taira are remembered there and even after the Gempei war, the relatives of the deceased were able to recover the remains of their fallen and exhibit ritual behaviors to honor those individuals. The annihilation of the Taira was complete, but there were still those who remained to remember them. By contrast, the complete annihilation of Hiroshima shatters entire family units and leaves behind a scenario with no place, no way, and no one to give proper service and respect to the dead, as an entire block of society was ripped from existence. It is with this important point that Masuji Ibuse’s Black Rain steps forward to render a systematic way of coping with the atomic bomb, helping to both offer and to explain the human need to justify the facts of existence and the desire to maintain some form of normalcy and ritual life in the face of overwhelming destruction. An excellent point in the novel that aids in illustrating this need to cope is the ongoing requirement for the character Shigematsu to conduct funeral rights at the behest of his manager, who advises him, “We can’t just simply cremate them. You can’t just say, ‘why, he’s dead!’ and whisk him off and burn him and have done with it. It’s a bit hard on the deceased, surely, unless he gets at least something more than that. Personally, now, I don’t believe in the immortality of the soul, but I do believe one should dispose of the dead with respect” (Ibuse 131). This story perfectly frames the Japanese relationship between the living and the dead, despite the extraordinary circumstances. It is an absolute necessity in Japan for the relatives of the dead to offer their respect, a function that is not possible for those family units wiped out in Hiroshima. Similar to the recitation of the Heike Monogatari, Ibuse gives voice to real people through a fictional framework, not unlike a work of historical fiction, for lack of a better descriptor. By helping to share the stories of the survivors and victims of the atomic bombing, Ibuse helps to fulfill the role of storyteller in order to preserve the event and the site, since the real site is no longer in existence.
Denial of this memory has a very strong attraction, especially for those who were not there and have no ties to Hiroshima as it was before 8:15 am. Though not attempting to take anything away from the astounding commercial and political recovery of Hiroshima, the human toll is still there below the surface, though people are not always willing to see it. In the end of Black Rain it becomes clear that Shigematsu and his wife Shigeko share a denial of Yasuko’s condition. No amount of posturing or reasoning will take away the simple fact that she is a victim of the atomic bomb and she will either be shunned from society because of her condition, or die fighting her sickness. This sudden acquiescence to the truth can be seen through Ibuse’s method of spending over 200 pages relating the diary entries of Shigeko, Shigematsu, and others, which argue the good health of Yasuko, to suddenly coming to a screeching halt with Shigematsu suddenly stating that “Yasuko has begun to show symptoms of radiation sickness. Everything has fallen through. By now, it is neither possible nor necessary to go on pretending” (Ibuse 219). He continues to explain that Yasuko sent a letter to her potential suitor explaining her symptoms, and telling Shigematsu of her deteriorating sight and the ringing in her ears. Shigematsu hauntingly closes the chapter: “When she first told me about it, in the living room, there was a moment when the living room vanished and I saw a great, mushroom-shaped cloud rising into a blue sky. I saw it quite distinctly” (Ibuse 219). In the case of Hiroshima, things such as the Mazda factory and events such as Toukasan, which would indicate recovery and progress, only serve to highlight what once was and what is missing. Toukasan is an especially furtive source for this when compared to other matsuri; the lack of floats, costumes, and ancient traditions all stem from the fact that Hiroshima lost those things in the bombing and is now a city of immigrants who repopulated the region. Toukasan is an attempt at normal life, but as akin to Shigematsu’s fish project, it can only shroud reality for so long before things come to the surface.
Connecting these seemingly disjointed sites and using them to construct a frame around Hiroshima as it exists today, the memory of the atomic bombing can be more clearly recognized. Like black holes in the cosmos, it is the lack of escaping light, the absence of everyday events that are taken for granted, that allows viewers to color in the details of Hiroshima’s history. This consciousness is overwhelming in its scope and complexity, and incredibly difficult to articulate. At the risk of sounding pretentious, I am moved to humbly apologize for the inability to portray the latticework of Hiroshima, and know that because this cultural construct is being experienced from countless steps removed, it cannot ever be completely comprehended. The tragic realization is that the closest link that exists are the hibakusha, who are bound by the laws of mortality. Shigematsu states, “In olden times, people used to say that in an area ravaged by war it took a century to repair the moral damage done to the inhabitants; and it began to seem as though they might have been right” (Ibuse 149). Like Yasuko waiting for the other shoe to drop, knowing her aunt and uncle are in denial, like the hibakusha of real life who spent, and still spend, every day after the bombing wondering if the next morning would bring the first signs of radiation sickness, like the parents of children and grandchildren hoping and praying that they have healthy offspring, like relatives hoping their son or daughter can find happiness in marriage, the specter of the atomic bomb hangs over those who survived, and that is the immortal story of Hiroshima. While Izumo and its kami are eternal, once the last hibakusha is gone from the earth, so too does the last direct link to the events of the atomic bombing. This focal point is the reason why it is absolutely essential that the memory of Hiroshima be carried on by authors such as Ibuse, by the descendants of survivors, and by those of us who choose to travel to the complete opposite end to the globe to listen and learn the reality of the situation, complex though it may be. Our continuation forms a new chain of understanding to take up the one shattered by the atomic bomb. Though the remembrance of those that perished is a private, personal affair, the story that is to be carried forward is a public one. Although these two sides may not ever be able to mesh, the brave actions of the hibakusha make it clear that the story of Hiroshima is one that has to be told to future generations.
A.C. Harrison